Uh, nice idea, Celeste, but this scares me a little, because I would rather suggest to rethink working habits a tiny little bit for Verve. Yes, yes, of course, I have layers, but you should really get a feel for what those layers mean to Verve. It is a little different in spirit than in other, "traditional" digital painters like Photoshop or Painter, you know. Verve acts possibly a little strange there. Thus, think of Verve a bit more like a real canvas. As I said, layers do work and I love using them for additive and multiply, also for my favorite workflow with them:
- making a pencil or ink like sketch in one layer.
- adding a layer under it to create coloring behind the sketch.
- adding a layer on top of all to add highlights (either additive or simply with brighter colors, depending on what feels best at the time).
I'm squinting my eyes in concern, but when one would use layers to isolate complete elements, it's a little scary, I find, because it won't give you the interaction with the existing color of the canvas, which is part of the beauty of Verve, you know. It also may or may not act undesirably with edges, depending on how you approach it.
So, just a little caring warning. But, YES, naming layers and far more layer features are a very good call!
